PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMC vs. BUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMC vs. BUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMC achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than BUSA's 8.42% return.


BSMC

1D
1.10%
1M
1.03%
YTD
10.45%
6M
12.04%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUSA

1D
1.39%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.42%
6M
10.80%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMC vs. BUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSMC
Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF
10.45%15.52%10.21%11.69%
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
8.42%17.56%15.76%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMC and BUSA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2023

0.86

The correlation between BSMC and BUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSMC vs. BUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMC
BUSA

Healthcare

21.3%
23.8%

Industrials

19.1%
12.4%

Technology

14.7%
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

13.0%
5.1%

Financial Services

10.4%
20.1%

Energy

7.5%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.9%
5.6%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.4%

Healthcare

BSMC
21.3%
BUSA
23.8%

Industrials

BSMC
19.1%
BUSA
12.4%

Technology

BSMC
14.7%
BUSA
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

BSMC
13.0%
BUSA
5.1%

Financial Services

BSMC
10.4%
BUSA
20.1%

Energy

BSMC
7.5%
BUSA
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BSMC
6.6%
BUSA
4.9%

Communication Services

BSMC
3.9%
BUSA
5.6%

Basic Materials

BSMC
3.4%
BUSA
4.1%

Real Estate

BSMC

-

BUSA

-

Utilities

BSMC

-

BUSA
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMC vs. BUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMC
BSMC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BUSA
BUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMC vs. BUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMCBUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.22

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

10.94

-0.85

BSMC vs. BUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the BUSA Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMC and BUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMCBUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.06

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

1.49

-0.33

Drawdowns

BSMC vs. BUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMC drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, which is greater than BUSA's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMC and BUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMCBUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-14.19%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-7.61%

-1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

0.00%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-2.15%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.23%

+0.31%

Volatility

BSMC vs. BUSA - Volatility Comparison

Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) at 2.79%. This indicates that BSMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMCBUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.79%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

8.53%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

11.88%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

13.66%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

13.66%

+2.43%

BSMC vs. BUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMC has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BUSA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMC vs. BUSA - Dividend Comparison

BSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than BUSA's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BSMC
Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF
0.94%1.17%1.02%0.15%
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
1.46%1.53%1.37%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMC and BUSA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSMC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to BUSA (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMC dropped -19.15% vs BUSA's -14.19%.

On 1-year performance, BSMC leads with 25.58% vs 24.37% for BUSA. On fees, BUSA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSMC has performed better with a 25.58% return vs 24.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUSA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BSMC.

BUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.94% for BSMC.

BSMC is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BUSA is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BSMC and 0.60% for BUSA.

BUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMC and BUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer