PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJX vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJX vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 8.03% return.


BSJX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLG

1D
0.42%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.64%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
17.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJX vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSJX and XLG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.59

BSJX vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJX
XLG

Energy

9.6%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
11.3%

Technology

6.3%
43.9%

Industrials

6.1%
1.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
17.1%

Basic Materials

3.4%
0.6%

Healthcare

3.1%
7.0%

Financial Services

2.8%
9.6%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
5.8%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Energy

BSJX
9.6%
XLG
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJX
8.2%
XLG
11.3%

Technology

BSJX
6.3%
XLG
43.9%

Industrials

BSJX
6.1%
XLG
1.9%

Communication Services

BSJX
3.7%
XLG
17.1%

Basic Materials

BSJX
3.4%
XLG
0.6%

Healthcare

BSJX
3.1%
XLG
7.0%

Financial Services

BSJX
2.8%
XLG
9.6%

Utilities

BSJX
2.7%
XLG

-

Consumer Defensive

BSJX
1.9%
XLG
5.8%

Real Estate

BSJX
1.3%
XLG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJX vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJX

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJX vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSJX vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJXXLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.63

+0.99

Drawdowns

BSJX vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJX drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJX and XLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJXXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-52.39%

+48.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.02%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-7.64%

+7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

Volatility

BSJX vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJXXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

13.32%

-9.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

18.68%

-14.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

18.84%

-14.53%

BSJX vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJX vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

BSJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.43%4.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJX and XLG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJX.

BSJX has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

BSJX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSJX tracks IVZ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJX and 0.20% for XLG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJX and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer