BSJU vs. HYLB
BSJU (Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJU tracks the Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index while HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJU returned 8.46%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for HYLB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BSJU charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.
Performance
BSJU vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSJU having a 1.21% return and HYLB slightly lower at 1.17%.
BSJU
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLB
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 6.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJU vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.21% | 8.58% | 8.20% | 12.91% | -2.11% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.17% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJU and HYLB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between BSJU and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJU vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
BSJU
HYLB
BSJU vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJU | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.86 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | 12.26 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJU | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.74 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.58 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
BSJU vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJU drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJU and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJU | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -22.91% | +15.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -2.27% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.12% | -4.51% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.55% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -2.43% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.53% | +0.01% |
Volatility
BSJU vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) have volatilities of 1.28% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJU | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 1.24% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 2.96% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 3.73% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.90% | 7.47% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.90% | 8.18% | -0.28% |
BSJU vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJU vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than HYLB's 6.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.66% | 6.52% | 7.08% | 6.74% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.51% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BSJU and HYLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSJU has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to HYLB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJU dropped -7.51% vs HYLB's -22.91%.
On 3-year performance, HYLB leads with 8.57% vs 8.46% for BSJU. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 8.57% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJU.
BSJU has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 6.51% for HYLB.
BSJU tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJU and 0.15% for HYLB.
BSJU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJU and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer