BSJS vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSJS returned 3.25%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for QTUM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJS charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

BSJS vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.

BSJS

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 2.34%
• 1Y: 6.19%
• 3Y*: 8.40%
• 5Y*: 3.25%
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 47.39%
• 6M: 45.72%
• 1Y: 82.93%
• 3Y*: 48.15%
• 5Y*: 28.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.84%	8.31%	7.38%	12.28%	-13.69%	3.40%	3.92%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	47.39%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	24.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJS and QTUM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020	0.58

The correlation between BSJS and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJS vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSJS	QTUM
Healthcare	10.5%	0.6%
Industrials	9.1%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	0.7%
Communication Services	5.5%	4.9%
Energy	5.4%	-
Financial Services	5.3%	-
Technology	4.5%	85.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

BSJS vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS

BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 84
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 90
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSJS	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.94	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	3.45	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.46	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	5.46	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.43	19.77	-1.34

BSJS vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJS and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJS	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.73%	-38.45%	+20.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-15.26%	+13.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.44%	-25.39%	+20.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	-38.45%	+20.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-4.42%	+4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.97%	-8.24%	+4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	4.21%	-3.87%

Volatility

BSJS vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is 0.76%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that BSJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJS	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	14.18%	-13.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.06%	23.17%	-21.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	28.39%	-25.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.39%	26.99%	-19.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.13%	27.40%	-20.27%

BSJS vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJS vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than QTUM's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.26%	6.49%	7.04%	6.75%	5.82%	4.86%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.73%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJS and QTUM in my portfolio?

BSJS and QTUM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJS or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to BSJS (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, BSJS or QTUM?

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 3.25% for BSJS. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJS or QTUM?

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJS or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJS or QTUM?

BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.73% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between BSJS and QTUM?

BSJS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while QTUM is Technology Equities. BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.