BSJS vs. BSCT
BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while BSCT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSJS returned 3.29%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for BSCT. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJS charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCT.
Performance
BSJS vs. BSCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than BSCT's 0.57% return.
BSJS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJS vs. BSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.67% | 8.31% | 7.38% | 12.28% | -13.69% | 3.40% | 4.05% |
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.57% | 7.51% | 3.45% | 8.61% | -12.88% | -2.13% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJS and BSCT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between BSJS and BSCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSJS vs. BSCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJS
BSCT
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
BSJS
BSCT
Industrials
BSJS
BSCT
Consumer Cyclical
BSJS
BSCT
Communication Services
BSJS
BSCT
Energy
BSJS
BSCT
Financial Services
BSJS
BSCT
Technology
BSJS
BSCT
Consumer Defensive
BSJS
BSCT
Real Estate
BSJS
BSCT
Basic Materials
BSJS
BSCT
Utilities
BSJS
BSCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJS vs. BSCT — Risk / Return Rank
BSJS
BSCT
BSJS vs. BSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJS | BSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 2.99 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.33 | 11.10 | +8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJS | BSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.11 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.22 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.32 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
BSJS vs. BSCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum BSCT drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and BSCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJS | BSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -19.14% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.64% | -1.63% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.44% | -4.21% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -19.14% | +1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.53% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -5.37% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 0.44% | -0.10% |
Volatility
BSJS vs. BSCT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) at 0.60%. This indicates that BSJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJS | BSCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 0.60% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 1.60% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 2.31% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 5.71% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 7.26% | -0.12% |
BSJS vs. BSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJS vs. BSCT - Dividend Comparison
BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than BSCT's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.53% | 4.51% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 1.94% | 2.24% | 0.86% |
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.27% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJS and BSCT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSJS has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to BSCT (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs BSCT's -19.14%.
On 5-year performance, BSJS leads with 3.29% vs 1.25% for BSCT. On fees, BSCT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSJS has performed better with a 3.29% return vs 1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 4.57% for BSCT.
BSJS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BSCT is Corporate Bonds. BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while BSCT tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.10% for BSCT.
BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJS and BSCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer