PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJQ vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJQ vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJQ achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.


BSJQ

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.28%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJQ vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.85%6.59%7.49%9.83%-7.35%4.53%2.80%16.74%-4.08%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-12.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJQ and RSP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018

0.66

The correlation between BSJQ and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSJQ vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJQ
RSP

Financial Services

39.0%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
9.9%

Technology

5.0%
19.6%

Real Estate

3.6%
6.0%

Industrials

2.1%
14.1%

Communication Services

1.8%
3.7%

Energy

1.6%
4.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Healthcare

-

11.0%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Financial Services

BSJQ
39.0%
RSP
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJQ
7.0%
RSP
9.9%

Technology

BSJQ
5.0%
RSP
19.6%

Real Estate

BSJQ
3.6%
RSP
6.0%

Industrials

BSJQ
2.1%
RSP
14.1%

Communication Services

BSJQ
1.8%
RSP
3.7%

Energy

BSJQ
1.6%
RSP
4.5%

Basic Materials

BSJQ

-

RSP
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

BSJQ

-

RSP
6.5%

Healthcare

BSJQ

-

RSP
11.0%

Utilities

BSJQ

-

RSP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJQ vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJQ
BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJQ vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJQRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.30

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.57

2.49

+6.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.55

9.48

+32.07

BSJQ vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJQ and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJQRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

1.70

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.52

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Drawdowns

BSJQ vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJQ drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJQ and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJQRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.13%

-59.92%

+35.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.54%

-7.85%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-17.81%

+15.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.95%

-21.38%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.38%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-6.65%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

2.06%

-1.95%

Volatility

BSJQ vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) is 0.54%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that BSJQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJQRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

2.56%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.98%

8.29%

-7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38%

11.56%

-10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

16.18%

-10.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.45%

18.35%

-9.90%

BSJQ vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJQ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJQ vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

BSJQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
5.83%6.10%6.58%6.58%5.58%4.27%4.64%4.59%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJQ and RSP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJQ dropped -24.13% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.33% vs 3.74% for BSJQ. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJQ.

BSJQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

BSJQ is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJQ and 0.20% for RSP.

BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJQ and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer