BSJO vs. XLG
BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJO is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. BSJO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
BSJO vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSJO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.28%
BSJO vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 9.83% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJO vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
BSJO
XLG
BSJO vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJO | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.63 | — |
Drawdowns
BSJO vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJO drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJO and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJO | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -52.39% | +52.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -7.64% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility
BSJO vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJO | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 13.32% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.68% | -18.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.84% | -18.84% |
BSJO vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJO vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJO.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.
BSJO is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSJO tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJO and 0.20% for XLG.
Find the right allocation for BSJO and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer