PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSIIX vs. FCNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSIIX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than FCNVX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BSIIX has outperformed FCNVX with an annualized return of 3.83%, while FCNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.


BSIIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.13%
YTD
1.79%
6M
2.15%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
3.83%

FCNVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
2.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
1.79%8.59%5.22%6.18%-6.14%0.80%7.22%7.65%-0.42%4.89%
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
1.50%4.51%5.43%5.86%0.85%-0.06%1.10%3.00%1.82%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BSIIX and FCNVX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSIIX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSIIX
BSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNVX
FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSIIXFCNVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-20.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

14.09

-12.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

42.87

-40.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

146.17

-136.50

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is lower than the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSIIX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSIIXFCNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

3.60

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

2.79

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.22

2.48

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

2.20

-0.89

Drawdowns

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSIIX drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSIIX and FCNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSIIXFCNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-2.19%

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-0.10%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.84%

-0.30%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.13%

-0.59%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.91%

-2.19%

-7.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-0.05%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.03%

+0.70%

Volatility

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.33%. This indicates that BSIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSIIXFCNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

0.33%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

0.78%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

1.19%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

1.29%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.14%

1.04%

+2.10%

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSIIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSIIX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

BSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than FCNVX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
5.16%5.07%4.75%3.33%3.58%2.98%2.92%3.54%3.32%3.45%2.91%3.19%
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
4.15%4.41%5.17%4.97%1.24%0.24%0.99%2.45%2.21%1.30%1.01%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSIIX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSIIX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to FCNVX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSIIX dropped -18.76% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSIIX and FCNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer