PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSIF.L vs. FDUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L) and Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BSIF.L is traded in GBp, while FDUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FDUS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSIF.L achieves a 41.64% return, which is significantly higher than FDUS's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BSIF.L has underperformed FDUS with an annualized return of 6.19%, while FDUS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.


BSIF.L

1D
0.22%
1M
17.87%
YTD
41.64%
6M
37.82%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
-2.41%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
6.19%

FDUS

1D
2.07%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
0.59%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSIF.L
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
41.64%-19.30%-13.74%-6.53%16.69%1.89%-2.51%22.16%11.37%15.11%
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
0.59%-5.20%22.65%14.02%31.02%52.08%-3.70%35.37%-8.58%-2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BSIF.L and FDUS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.05

Fundamentals

EPS

BSIF.L:

-£0.06

FDUS:

$2.40

PS Ratio

BSIF.L:

76.44

FDUS:

4.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

BSIF.L:

£7.10M

FDUS:

$140.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BSIF.L:

-£4.75M

FDUS:

$91.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

BSIF.L:

-£30.10M

FDUS:

$98.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSIF.L vs. FDUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSIF.L
BSIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BSIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FDUS
FDUS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L) and Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSIF.LFDUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.06

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

0.34

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

0.69

-0.08

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSIF.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is comparable to the FDUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSIF.L and FDUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSIF.LFDUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.25

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.73

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.44

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.44

-0.07

Drawdowns

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSIF.L drawdown since its inception was -40.05%, smaller than the maximum FDUS drawdown of -66.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSIF.L and FDUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSIF.LFDUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.05%

-66.67%

+26.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.46%

-15.53%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.91%

-25.04%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.05%

-25.04%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.05%

-66.67%

+26.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.05%

-13.72%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-9.37%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.47%

7.61%

+7.86%

Volatility

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Volatility Comparison

Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L) has a higher volatility of 15.83% compared to Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) at 10.63%. This indicates that BSIF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSIF.LFDUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.83%

10.63%

+5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.05%

17.10%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.57%

21.36%

+10.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.74%

20.35%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

33.56%

-15.48%

Dividends

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Dividend Comparison

BSIF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, less than FDUS's 11.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSIF.L
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
9.83%12.99%9.34%7.25%6.03%6.43%6.06%5.86%6.00%3.38%6.82%7.11%
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
11.34%11.14%11.51%14.63%10.51%8.90%10.15%10.78%13.69%10.54%10.17%11.69%

Financials

BSIF.L vs. FDUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bluefield Solar Income Fund and Fidus Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M202120222023202420252026
11.85M
34.29M
(BSIF.L) Total Revenue
(FDUS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BSIF.L values in GBp, FDUS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BSIF.L and FDUS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSIF.L and FDUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer