PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSIF.L vs. LIO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L) and Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSIF.L achieves a 41.64% return, which is significantly higher than LIO.L's 16.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BSIF.L has underperformed LIO.L with an annualized return of 6.19%, while LIO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.


BSIF.L

1D
0.22%
1M
17.87%
YTD
41.64%
6M
37.82%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
-2.41%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
6.19%

LIO.L

1D
1.64%
1M
23.46%
YTD
16.95%
6M
21.76%
1Y
-7.03%
3Y*
-16.87%
5Y*
-19.70%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSIF.L
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
41.64%-19.30%-13.74%-6.53%16.69%1.89%-2.51%22.16%11.37%15.11%
LIO.L
Liontrust Asset Management
16.95%-34.62%-14.25%-37.55%-45.27%74.21%21.37%95.83%23.19%32.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BSIF.L and LIO.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.15

The correlation between BSIF.L and LIO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BSIF.L:

-£0.06

LIO.L:

£0.43

PS Ratio

BSIF.L:

76.44

LIO.L:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

BSIF.L:

£7.10M

LIO.L:

£332.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BSIF.L:

-£4.75M

LIO.L:

£168.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

BSIF.L:

-£30.10M

LIO.L:

£68.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSIF.L
BSIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BSIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

LIO.L
LIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L) and Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSIF.LLIO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.00

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

-0.18

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

-0.27

+0.88

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSIF.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the LIO.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSIF.L and LIO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSIF.LLIO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

-0.18

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.48

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.20

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.19

+0.18

Drawdowns

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSIF.L drawdown since its inception was -40.05%, smaller than the maximum LIO.L drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSIF.L and LIO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSIF.LLIO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.05%

-85.10%

+45.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.46%

-39.01%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.91%

-63.98%

+28.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.05%

-85.06%

+45.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.05%

-85.06%

+45.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.05%

-79.96%

+66.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-36.05%

+28.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.47%

25.57%

-10.10%

Volatility

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Volatility Comparison

Bluefield Solar Income Fund (BSIF.L) has a higher volatility of 15.83% compared to Liontrust Asset Management (LIO.L) at 8.56%. This indicates that BSIF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSIF.LLIO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.83%

8.56%

+7.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.05%

27.20%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.57%

38.10%

-6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.74%

41.04%

-19.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

40.46%

-22.38%

Dividends

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Dividend Comparison

BSIF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, less than LIO.L's 18.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSIF.L
Bluefield Solar Income Fund
9.83%12.99%9.34%7.25%6.03%6.43%6.06%5.86%6.00%3.38%6.82%7.11%
LIO.L
Liontrust Asset Management
18.36%21.47%15.13%11.43%6.43%2.64%2.69%2.64%3.95%3.27%3.39%3.22%

Financials

BSIF.L vs. LIO.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bluefield Solar Income Fund and Liontrust Asset Management. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
11.85M
69.45M
(BSIF.L) Total Revenue
(LIO.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BSIF.L and LIO.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSIF.L and LIO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer