BSCZ vs. SPMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO).
BSCZ and SPMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2025. SPMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Momentum Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2015. Both BSCZ and SPMO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSCZ vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCZ vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.38% | 5.67% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -5.78% | 12.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's -5.78% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 3.96%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -5.78%
- 6M
- -6.90%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.36%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCZ vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
SPMO
BSCZ vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.85 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and SPMO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SPMO's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 3.25% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.91% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and SPMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -30.95% | +27.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -9.24% | +7.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -4.66% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 22.68% | -17.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 19.06% | -14.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 20.08% | -15.10% |