PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSCZ vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSCZ vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's -5.78% return.


BSCZ

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPMO

1D
3.96%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
-5.78%
6M
-6.90%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
28.36%
5Y*
17.17%
10Y*
17.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSCZ vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.85

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and SPMO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SPMO's 0.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
3.25%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.91%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and SPMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-30.95%

+27.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-9.24%

+7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-4.66%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSCZSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

22.68%

-17.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

19.06%

-14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

20.08%

-15.10%