BSCZ vs. SPHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD).
BSCZ and SPHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2025. SPHD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both BSCZ and SPHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSCZ vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCZ vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.38% | 5.67% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.64% | 3.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 4.64% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCZ vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
SPHD
BSCZ vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.59 | +0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and SPHD is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than SPHD's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 3.25% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.31% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and SPHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -41.39% | +38.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -5.14% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.58% | -4.70% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.67% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 14.51% | -9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 14.20% | -9.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 17.65% | -12.67% |