BSCZ vs. FAAR
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCZ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. BSCZ is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 25.13% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 25.13%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.33% | 5.67% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.13% | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and FAAR is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | -0.28 |
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCZ
FAAR
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Communication Services
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Technology
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Financial Services
BSCZ
FAAR
Energy
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Industrials
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Utilities
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Real Estate
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Basic Materials
BSCZ
FAAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
FAAR
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.44 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -18.03% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.57% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -7.84% | +7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 13.49% | -8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 13.01% | -8.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 11.51% | -6.53% |
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than FAAR's 9.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.08% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.20% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCZ and FAAR have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 4.08% for BSCZ.
BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.95% for FAAR.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer