PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCX vs. SPLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCX vs. SPLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than SPLB's 0.92% return.


BSCX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.21%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPLB

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.50%
YTD
0.92%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCX vs. SPLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
0.17%9.31%1.73%7.88%
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.92%7.05%-1.74%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCX and SPLB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.94

The correlation between BSCX and SPLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCX vs. SPLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCX
BSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLB
SPLB Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCX vs. SPLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCXSPLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.40

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

3.48

+3.35

BSCX vs. SPLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the SPLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCX and SPLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCXSPLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.94

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.45

+0.72

Drawdowns

BSCX vs. SPLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum SPLB drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCX and SPLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCXSPLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-34.46%

+29.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-5.42%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-14.53%

+13.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-8.01%

+6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.18%

-1.29%

Volatility

BSCX vs. SPLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) is 1.32%, while SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that BSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCXSPLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.36%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

5.81%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

8.05%

-3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

12.71%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

12.95%

-6.87%

BSCX vs. SPLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCX vs. SPLB - Dividend Comparison

BSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than SPLB's 5.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
4.89%4.82%5.00%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPLB
SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.38%5.25%5.20%4.60%4.53%3.00%3.01%3.79%4.50%4.06%4.34%4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BSCX and SPLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPLB has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to BSCX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCX dropped -5.13% vs SPLB's -34.46%.

On 1-year performance, SPLB leads with 7.56% vs 6.09% for BSCX. On fees, SPLB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPLB has performed better with a 7.56% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCX.

SPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 4.89% for BSCX.

BSCX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while SPLB tracks Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCX and 0.07% for SPLB.

BSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCX and SPLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer