BSCX vs. CEMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCX (Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and CEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCX tracks the Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index while CEMB tracks the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSCX returned 6.09% vs 7.31% for CEMB. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSCX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CEMB.

Performance

BSCX vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than CEMB's 1.49% return.

BSCX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.21%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEMB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 7.31%
• 3Y*: 7.31%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 3.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCX vs. CEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF	0.17%	9.31%	1.73%	7.88%
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	1.49%	8.86%	5.81%	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCX and CEMB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.82

The correlation between BSCX and CEMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSCX vs. CEMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCX	CEMB
Healthcare	12.2%	-
Technology	10.2%	-
Financial Services	10.2%	-
Communication Services	9.3%	-
Energy	8.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	-
Industrials	7.4%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	-
Utilities	5.7%	-
Real Estate	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

BSCX vs. CEMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCX

BSCX Risk / Return Rank: 43
BSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CEMB

CEMB Risk / Return Rank: 69
CEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCX vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCX	CEMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.40	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	3.61	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.47	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	2.55	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.83	11.06	-4.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCX vs. CEMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the CEMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCX and CEMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCX	CEMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.40	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	0.49	+0.67

Drawdowns

BSCX vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum CEMB drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCX and CEMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCX	CEMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-20.84%	+15.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.90%	-2.88%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-0.24%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-3.66%	+2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.66%	+0.23%

Volatility

BSCX vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) at 1.08%. This indicates that BSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCX	CEMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	1.08%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	2.43%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.11%	3.06%	+1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.08%	5.63%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.08%	6.30%	-0.22%

BSCX vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSCX vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison

BSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than CEMB's 5.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCX Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF	4.89%	4.82%	5.00%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF	5.13%	5.14%	5.11%	4.77%	4.29%	3.51%	3.86%	4.19%	4.66%	4.06%	4.26%	4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCX and CEMB in my portfolio?

BSCX and CEMB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCX or CEMB?

BSCX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to CEMB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCX dropped -5.13% vs CEMB's -20.84%.

Which ETF is better, BSCX or CEMB?

On 1-year performance, CEMB leads with 7.31% vs 6.09% for BSCX. On fees, BSCX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSCX or CEMB?

Over the 1-year period, CEMB has performed better with a 7.31% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCX or CEMB?

BSCX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CEMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCX or CEMB?

CEMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.89% for BSCX.

What is the main difference between BSCX and CEMB?

BSCX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while CEMB tracks JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCX and 0.50% for CEMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.