BSCW vs. VDC
BSCW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCW is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSCW returned 5.57%/yr vs 7.43%/yr for VDC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
BSCW vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCW achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 5.75% return.
BSCW
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDC
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 1.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
BSCW vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.16% | 9.00% | 2.20% | 9.31% | 0.31% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 5.75% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | 2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCW and VDC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.28 |
BSCW vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCW
VDC
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Technology
BSCW
VDC
-
Financial Services
BSCW
VDC
-
Healthcare
BSCW
VDC
Consumer Cyclical
BSCW
VDC
Communication Services
BSCW
VDC
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCW
VDC
Industrials
BSCW
VDC
Real Estate
BSCW
VDC
-
Energy
BSCW
VDC
-
Utilities
BSCW
VDC
-
Basic Materials
BSCW
VDC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCW vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
BSCW
VDC
BSCW vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCW | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.03 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.13 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 0.28 | +6.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCW | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.10 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.66 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
BSCW vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCW drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum VDC drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCW and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCW | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -34.24% | +25.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -9.28% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.24% | -11.78% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -8.52% | +7.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -3.73% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 4.49% | -3.63% |
Volatility
BSCW vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) is 1.20%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that BSCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCW | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 4.09% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 9.76% | -6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 12.36% | -8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 13.13% | -5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 14.64% | -7.40% |
BSCW vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCW vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
BSCW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than VDC's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.83% | 4.81% | 5.06% | 4.80% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.17% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCW and VDC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to BSCW (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCW dropped -8.32% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 3-year performance, VDC leads with 7.43% vs 5.57% for BSCW. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BSCW has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCW.
BSCW has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 2.17% for VDC.
BSCW is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. BSCW tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCW and 0.09% for VDC.
BSCW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCW and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer