PortfoliosLab logo
IBDS vs. FLOT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBDS and FLOT is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

IBDS vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF (IBDS) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

IBDS:

1.56%

FLOT:

2.14%

Max Drawdown

IBDS:

-0.12%

FLOT:

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

IBDS:

-0.12%

FLOT:

0.00%

Returns By Period


IBDS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FLOT

YTD

1.37%

1M

1.23%

6M

2.14%

1Y

5.16%

5Y*

3.59%

10Y*

2.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBDS vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBDS vs. FLOT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBDS is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBDS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBDS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBDS is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBDS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBDS is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLOT is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLOT is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBDS vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF (IBDS) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

IBDS vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

IBDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than FLOT's 5.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IBDS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF
4.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
5.45%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.45%0.97%0.53%0.44%

Drawdowns

IBDS vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDS drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum FLOT drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDS and FLOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IBDS vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...