BSCU vs. SCHJ
BSCU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF) and SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCU is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while SCHJ is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCU returned 0.22%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for SCHJ. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BSCU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHJ.
Performance
BSCU vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCU achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCHJ's 0.85% return.
BSCU
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.28%
SCHJ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.98M | $11.72M | $11.11M | |
| $5.83M | $7.78M | $6.51M |
BSCU vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.34% | 8.24% | 3.12% | 8.66% | -15.08% | -3.02% | 1.43% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.85% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCU and SCHJ is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BSCU and SCHJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCU vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank
BSCU
SCHJ
BSCU vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCU | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.31 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.11 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 7.94 | -4.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCU vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCU drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, which is greater than SCHJ's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCU and SCHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCU | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.34% | -13.62% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.07% | -1.47% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.73% | -1.47% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -9.35% | -12.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.22% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -1.84% | -6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 0.39% | +0.31% |
Volatility
BSCU vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) at 0.51%. This indicates that BSCU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCU | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 0.51% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.25% | 1.53% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 1.86% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 2.96% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 4.10% | +2.30% |
BSCU vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCU vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
BSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than SCHJ's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.62% | 4.56% | 4.70% | 4.07% | 3.06% | 1.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BSCU and SCHJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSCU has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to SCHJ (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCU dropped -22.34% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.
On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.32% vs 0.22% for BSCU. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.32% return vs 0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCU.
BSCU has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.53% for SCHJ.
BSCU is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHJ is Short-Term Bond. BSCU tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCU and 0.03% for SCHJ.
SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCU and SCHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer