BSCT vs. BSJS
BSCT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCT returned 1.25%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for BSJS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJS.
Performance
BSCT vs. BSJS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCT achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than BSJS's 1.67% return.
BSCT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCT vs. BSJS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.57% | 7.51% | 3.45% | 8.61% | -12.88% | -2.13% | 1.72% |
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.67% | 8.31% | 7.38% | 12.28% | -13.69% | 3.40% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCT and BSJS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between BSCT and BSJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSCT vs. BSJS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCT
BSJS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BSCT
BSJS
Financial Services
BSCT
BSJS
Healthcare
BSCT
BSJS
Consumer Cyclical
BSCT
BSJS
Communication Services
BSCT
BSJS
Industrials
BSCT
BSJS
Energy
BSCT
BSJS
Consumer Defensive
BSCT
BSJS
Utilities
BSCT
BSJS
Real Estate
BSCT
BSJS
Basic Materials
BSCT
BSJS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCT vs. BSJS — Risk / Return Rank
BSCT
BSJS
BSCT vs. BSJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCT | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.97 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 19.33 | -8.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCT | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.29 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.45 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.52 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
BSCT vs. BSJS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCT drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than BSJS's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCT and BSJS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCT | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -17.73% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -1.64% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.21% | -4.44% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.14% | -17.73% | -1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.05% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -3.99% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.34% | +0.10% |
Volatility
BSCT vs. BSJS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) is 0.60%, while Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) has a volatility of 0.72%. This indicates that BSCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCT | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 0.72% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | 2.03% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31% | 2.84% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 7.39% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 7.14% | +0.12% |
BSCT vs. BSJS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJS's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCT vs. BSJS - Dividend Comparison
BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than BSJS's 6.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.53% | 4.51% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 1.94% | 2.24% | 0.86% |
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.27% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCT and BSJS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSJS has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to BSCT (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCT dropped -19.14% vs BSJS's -17.73%.
On 5-year performance, BSJS leads with 3.29% vs 1.25% for BSCT. On fees, BSCT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSJS has performed better with a 3.29% return vs 1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 4.57% for BSCT.
BSCT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BSJS is High Yield Bonds. BSCT tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCT and 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCT and BSJS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer