PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCS vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCS vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSCS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.76%
6M
1.17%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCS vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


BSCS vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCS
QCON

Financial Services

14.8%
7.9%

Technology

11.9%

-

Healthcare

10.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Industrials

8.4%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%

-

Utilities

4.5%
1.5%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Financial Services

BSCS
14.8%
QCON
7.9%

Technology

BSCS
11.9%
QCON

-

Healthcare

BSCS
10.3%
QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSCS
9.4%
QCON

-

Industrials

BSCS
8.4%
QCON
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSCS
5.8%
QCON

-

Utilities

BSCS
4.5%
QCON
1.5%

Real Estate

BSCS
4.1%
QCON

-

Communication Services

BSCS
4.1%
QCON

-

Energy

BSCS
3.6%
QCON

-

Basic Materials

BSCS
1.4%
QCON

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCS vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCS
BSCS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCS vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCSQCONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.35

BSCS vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCSQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

Drawdowns

BSCS vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCSQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

0.00%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

0.00%

-4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

BSCS vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCSQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68%

0.00%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

0.00%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.24%

0.00%

+6.24%

BSCS vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCS vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.46%4.54%3.90%2.72%2.14%2.50%3.04%1.42%
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BSCS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

BSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCS and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCS and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer