BSCS vs. QCON
BSCS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCS is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
BSCS vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCS vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.25% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
BSCS vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCS
QCON
Financial Services
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
BSCS
QCON
Technology
BSCS
QCON
-
Healthcare
BSCS
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCS
QCON
-
Industrials
BSCS
QCON
Consumer Defensive
BSCS
QCON
-
Utilities
BSCS
QCON
Real Estate
BSCS
QCON
-
Communication Services
BSCS
QCON
-
Energy
BSCS
QCON
-
Basic Materials
BSCS
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCS vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
BSCS
QCON
BSCS vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.75 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BSCS vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCS drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCS and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | 0.00% | -18.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | 0.00% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | — | — |
Volatility
BSCS vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68% | 0.00% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 0.00% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 0.00% | +6.24% |
BSCS vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCS vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
BSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.46% | 4.54% | 3.90% | 2.72% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 3.04% | 1.42% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSCS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
BSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCS and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for BSCS and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer