PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCR vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCR vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.44% return.


BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.69%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*

FLDR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCR vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%9.68%14.88%1.24%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.44%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%2.01%4.52%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCR and FLDR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018

0.43

The correlation between BSCR and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCR vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCR vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCRFLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.14

2.75

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.08

10.24

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.99

70.25

-23.25

BSCR vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCR Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is comparable to the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCR and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCRFLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31

5.95

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

3.07

-2.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.62

-0.02

Drawdowns

BSCR vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCR drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCR and FLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCRFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-12.23%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.42%

-0.47%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-0.76%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-2.33%

-12.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-0.35%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.07%

+0.03%

Volatility

BSCR vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) have volatilities of 0.19% and 0.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCRFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.19%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

0.58%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08%

0.80%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

1.21%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

5.26%

+0.09%

BSCR vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCR vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

BSCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than FLDR's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.43%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCR and FLDR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLDR has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCR dropped -17.26% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

On 5-year performance, FLDR leads with 3.70% vs 1.41% for BSCR. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLDR has performed better with a 3.70% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.

FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.

BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCR and 0.15% for FLDR.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs 4.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCR and FLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer