BSCP vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BSCP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCP is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

BSCP vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSCP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 28.88%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 16.34%
• 10Y*: 17.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCP vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	4.19%	5.06%	5.11%	-5.99%	-1.37%	8.10%	12.76%	-1.90%	5.75%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.03%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCP and XLG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015	0.10

The correlation between BSCP and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSCP vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCP	XLG
Financial Services	96.4%	9.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	11.3%
Utilities	0.8%	-
Healthcare	0.6%	7.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Energy	-	2.7%
Industrials	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	43.9%

Return for Risk

BSCP vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCP vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCP	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.63	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCP	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-52.39%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.02%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.64%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSCP	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.32%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	18.68%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.84%	—

BSCP vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSCP vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

BSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF	2.27%	3.99%	3.96%	3.39%	2.24%	1.93%	2.42%	3.12%	3.26%	2.93%	2.94%	0.75%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCP and XLG in my portfolio?

BSCP and XLG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSCP or XLG?

On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCP or XLG?

BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCP or XLG?

BSCP has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between BSCP and XLG?

BSCP is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCP and 0.20% for XLG.