PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCP vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCP vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSCP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSP

1D
0.71%
1M
2.23%
YTD
10.72%
6M
9.45%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCP vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.19%5.06%5.11%-5.99%-1.37%8.10%12.76%-1.90%5.75%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.72%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCP and RSP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015

0.08

The correlation between BSCP and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCP vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCP vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCPRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

BSCP vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCP vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCPRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

Volatility

BSCP vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCPRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

BSCP vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCP vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

BSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than RSP's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
1.92%3.99%3.96%3.39%2.24%1.93%2.42%3.12%3.26%2.93%2.94%0.75%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.52%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCP and RSP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

BSCP has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.52% for RSP.

BSCP is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCP and 0.20% for RSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCP and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer