BRW vs. FCBYX
BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) and FCBYX (Nuveen Strategic Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, BRW returned 7.19%/yr vs 2.62%/yr for FCBYX. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BRW charges 1.71%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FCBYX.
Performance
BRW vs. FCBYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRW achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than FCBYX's 0.60% return.
BRW
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- -8.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.02%
FCBYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26M | $1.37M | $1.47M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BRW vs. FCBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.06% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.64% | 3.19% |
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | 0.60% | 8.55% | 6.86% | 9.14% | -10.36% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRW and FCBYX is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRW vs. FCBYX — Risk / Return Rank
BRW
FCBYX
BRW vs. FCBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRW | FCBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.39 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.11 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 6.86 | -7.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRW vs. FCBYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRW drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum FCBYX drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRW and FCBYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRW | FCBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -24.49% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.74% | -2.39% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.74% | -4.16% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -15.74% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -0.93% | -8.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -2.39% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.60% | 0.73% | +9.87% |
Volatility
BRW vs. FCBYX - Volatility Comparison
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) at 0.54%. This indicates that BRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRW | FCBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 0.54% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.85% | 2.10% | +6.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 2.73% | +10.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 4.14% | +8.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 4.19% | +8.71% |
BRW vs. FCBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRW has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBYX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRW vs. FCBYX - Dividend Comparison
BRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.41%, more than FCBYX's 4.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 15.41% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | 4.81% | 6.22% | 6.44% | 5.59% | 4.71% | 3.08% | 3.58% | 3.69% | 3.91% | 4.92% | 5.28% | 5.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRW and FCBYX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to FCBYX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRW dropped -17.74% vs FCBYX's -24.49%.
FCBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRW and FCBYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer