FCBYX vs. VVR
FCBYX (Nuveen Strategic Income Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while VVR (Invesco Senior Income Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FCBYX returned 3.92%/yr vs 5.55%/yr for VVR. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FCBYX vs. VVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBYX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than VVR's -1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBYX has underperformed VVR with an annualized return of 3.92%, while VVR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.55% annualized return.
FCBYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.95%
VVR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 1Y
- -10.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.40M | $2.19M | $2.41M |
FCBYX vs. VVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | 0.60% | 8.55% | 6.86% | 9.14% | -10.36% | 1.47% | 8.45% | 13.18% | -3.07% | 5.54% |
VVR Invesco Senior Income Trust | -1.92% | -6.18% | 8.97% | 20.86% | -1.11% | 17.00% | -0.22% | 16.97% | -5.36% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBYX and VVR is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2000 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBYX vs. VVR — Risk / Return Rank
FCBYX
VVR
FCBYX vs. VVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCBYX | VVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.89 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | -0.79 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.86 | -1.11 | +7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCBYX vs. VVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBYX drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, smaller than the maximum VVR drawdown of -73.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBYX and VVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBYX | VVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -73.79% | +49.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.39% | -12.38% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.16% | -19.50% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.74% | -19.50% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.93% | -55.92% | +39.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -14.03% | +13.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -10.92% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 8.84% | -8.11% |
Volatility
FCBYX vs. VVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) is 0.54%, while Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that FCBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBYX | VVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 2.76% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.10% | 11.86% | -9.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73% | 14.50% | -11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 16.04% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.19% | 23.55% | -19.36% |
Dividends
FCBYX vs. VVR - Dividend Comparison
FCBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than VVR's 14.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund | 4.81% | 6.22% | 6.44% | 5.59% | 4.71% | 3.08% | 3.58% | 3.69% | 3.91% | 4.92% | 5.28% | 5.53% |
VVR Invesco Senior Income Trust | 14.44% | 13.94% | 13.06% | 11.54% | 11.46% | 7.22% | 6.71% | 6.22% | 6.68% | 5.95% | 6.41% | 7.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCBYX and VVR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VVR has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to FCBYX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBYX dropped -24.49% vs VVR's -73.79%.
FCBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCBYX and VVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer