BRSM vs. PWC

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

BRSM (MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF) and PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. BRSM is actively managed, while PWC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BRSM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PWC.

Performance

BRSM vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF (BRSM) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BRSM

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 5.09%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWC

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: 5.36%
• YTD: 8.02%
• 1Y: 9.81%
• 3Y*: 13.13%
• 5Y*: 7.24%
• 10Y*: 9.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRSM vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF	2.65%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BRSM and PWC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026	-0.08

Return for Risk

BRSM vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRSM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PWC

PWC Risk / Return Rank: 32
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRSM vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF (BRSM) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRSM	PWC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.52	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.53	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.55	—

Drawdowns

BRSM vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRSM drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSM and PWC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRSM	PWC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-78.13%	+74.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-0.37%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-36.07%	+35.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BRSM	PWC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.99%	9.73%	+10.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.99%	16.02%	+3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	18.72%	+1.27%

BRSM vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRSM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRSM vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

BRSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	1.75%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRSM and PWC in my portfolio?

BRSM and PWC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRSM or PWC?

On fees, BRSM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRSM or PWC?

BRSM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRSM or PWC?

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for BRSM.

What is the main difference between BRSM and PWC?

They also come from different issuers: MFS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRSM and 0.60% for PWC.