BROL vs. BCSM
BROL (Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF) and BCSM (Baron SMID Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BROL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while BCSM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BROL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCSM.
Performance
BROL vs. BCSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BROL
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCSM
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BROL vs. BCSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BROL Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF | 2.61% |
BCSM Baron SMID Cap ETF | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BROL and BCSM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BROL vs. BCSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) and Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BROL vs. BCSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BROL drawdown since its inception was -4.67%, smaller than the maximum BCSM drawdown of -17.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BROL and BCSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BROL | BCSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.67% | -17.45% | +12.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -1.52% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -6.91% | +5.48% |
Volatility
BROL vs. BCSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BROL | BCSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 20.33% | -3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 20.33% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 20.33% | -3.16% |
BROL vs. BCSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BROL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BCSM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BROL vs. BCSM - Dividend Comparison
Neither BROL nor BCSM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BROL and BCSM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BROL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BROL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCSM.
BROL and BCSM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BROL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BCSM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BROL and 0.75% for BCSM.
Find the right allocation for BROL and BCSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer