PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRO vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRO vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Unilever PLC (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRO achieves a -13.05% return, which is significantly lower than UL's -3.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BRO has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 15.04%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.


BRO

1D
-0.59%
1M
16.65%
6M
-13.38%
YTD
-13.05%
1Y
-33.02%
3Y*
-0.37%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
15.04%
ALL TIME*
14.93%

UL

1D
-0.63%
1M
6.16%
6M
-2.23%
YTD
-3.56%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
5.17%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRO vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
-13.05%-21.37%44.32%25.73%-18.39%49.31%21.06%44.67%8.30%16.15%
UL
Unilever PLC
-3.56%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BRO and UL is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1992

0.23

The correlation between BRO and UL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BRO:

$23.37B

UL:

$133.56B

EPS

BRO:

$5.13

UL:

€5.38

PE Ratio

BRO:

13.43

UL:

10.07

PEG Ratio

BRO:

0.99

UL:

1.97

PS Ratio

BRO:

2.40

UL:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRO:

$6.43B

UL:

€109.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRO:

$3.82B

UL:

€90.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

BRO:

$1.51B

UL:

€24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRO vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRO
BRO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRO vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BROULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.98

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.18

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.17

-0.35

-0.82

BRO vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRO Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRO and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRO vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, roughly equal to the maximum UL drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRO and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BROULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-53.55%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.93%

-25.09%

-21.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.85%

-25.09%

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.85%

-25.09%

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.85%

-30.13%

-25.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.02%

-15.44%

-28.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-10.62%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.61%

13.20%

+15.41%

Volatility

BRO vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) has a higher volatility of 11.02% compared to Unilever PLC (UL) at 6.50%. This indicates that BRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BROULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.02%

6.50%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.89%

17.27%

+6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.37%

22.22%

+8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.27%

21.04%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.84%

21.52%

+2.32%

Dividends

BRO vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

BRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than UL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
0.94%0.77%0.53%0.67%0.74%0.54%0.73%0.82%1.11%1.08%1.12%1.41%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.68%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

BRO vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brown & Brown, Inc. and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.90B
18.38B
(BRO) Total Revenue
(UL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BRO values in USD, UL values in EUR

BRO vs. UL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brown & Brown, Inc. and Unilever PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
52.3%
0
Portfolio components
BRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

BRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unilever PLC reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BRO and UL have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRO has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to UL (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRO dropped -55.85% vs UL's -53.55%.

UL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRO and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer