PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRNY vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRNY vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BRNY vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BRNY
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
-2.29%22.02%28.84%22.36%8.91%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
7.89%10.98%12.21%28.40%4.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRNY achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than QVAL's 7.89% return.


BRNY

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
1.74%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
10Y*

QVAL

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
7.89%
6M
12.39%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BRNY vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRNY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BRNY vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRNY
BRNY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRNY vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRNYQVALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

1.84

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.71

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.13

7.37

+0.76

BRNY vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRNY and QVAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRNYQVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.47

+0.89

Correlation

The correlation between BRNY and QVAL is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BRNY vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

BRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than QVAL's 1.55% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRNY
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.38%0.30%0.23%0.68%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.55%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Drawdowns

BRNY vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRNY drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRNY and QVAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BRNYQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-51.49%

+32.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-14.61%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-2.33%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-7.90%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.40%

-0.47%

Volatility

BRNY vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) at 4.23%. This indicates that BRNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BRNYQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.23%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

10.22%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.99%

20.20%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

21.64%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

22.80%

-5.74%