BRMSX vs. EIGMX
BRMSX (Bramshill Income Performance Fund) and EIGMX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, BRMSX returned 2.06%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for EIGMX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRMSX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EIGMX.
Performance
BRMSX vs. EIGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRMSX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than EIGMX's 4.84% return.
BRMSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- —
EIGMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
BRMSX vs. EIGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRMSX Bramshill Income Performance Fund | 1.24% | 4.78% | 3.10% | 7.12% | -6.11% | 2.53% | 7.49% | 8.87% | 0.68% | 0.97% |
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 4.84% | 11.37% | 8.69% | 6.99% | -0.47% | 2.19% | 3.59% | 9.76% | -3.29% | 4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRMSX and EIGMX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.13 |
The correlation between BRMSX and EIGMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (5 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRMSX vs. EIGMX — Risk / Return Rank
BRMSX
EIGMX
BRMSX vs. EIGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRMSX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 3.21 | -2.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 8.59 | -7.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 31.15 | -27.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRMSX vs. EIGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRMSX drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, which is greater than EIGMX's maximum drawdown of -9.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRMSX and EIGMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRMSX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.06% | -9.42% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -1.44% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.52% | -1.63% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.49% | -7.39% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -0.92% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 0.40% | +0.84% |
Volatility
BRMSX vs. EIGMX - Volatility Comparison
Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) at 0.44%. This indicates that BRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRMSX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.44% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | 1.63% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 1.87% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 2.61% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 2.50% | +2.75% |
BRMSX vs. EIGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRMSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EIGMX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRMSX vs. EIGMX - Dividend Comparison
BRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than EIGMX's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRMSX Bramshill Income Performance Fund | 4.38% | 3.96% | 4.36% | 4.49% | 2.53% | 2.50% | 3.38% | 3.38% | 4.08% | 3.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 6.63% | 5.72% | 6.16% | 5.79% | 4.78% | 4.18% | 4.37% | 5.44% | 3.72% | 3.42% | 4.02% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRMSX and EIGMX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRMSX has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to EIGMX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRMSX dropped -17.06% vs EIGMX's -9.42%.
EIGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.63 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRMSX and EIGMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer