PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRMSX vs. DFLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) and DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund (DFLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRMSX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than DFLEX's 1.72% return.


BRMSX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.50%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.43%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*

DFLEX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.83%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
3.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRMSX
Bramshill Income Performance Fund
1.24%4.78%3.10%7.12%-6.11%2.53%7.49%8.87%0.68%0.97%
DFLEX
DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund
1.72%6.58%8.65%7.84%-8.48%3.79%2.93%7.21%0.10%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BRMSX and DFLEX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.43

Over the past year, BRMSX and DFLEX have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRMSX vs. DFLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRMSX
BRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLEX
DFLEX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DFLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) and DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund (DFLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRMSXDFLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

2.19

-0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

6.10

-4.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

27.31

-23.37

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the DFLEX Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRMSX and DFLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRMSX drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, roughly equal to the maximum DFLEX drawdown of -17.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRMSX and DFLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRMSXDFLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.06%

-17.29%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-0.91%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.52%

-1.15%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.49%

-11.00%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.11%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-1.55%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.20%

+1.04%

Volatility

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Volatility Comparison

Bramshill Income Performance Fund (BRMSX) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund (DFLEX) at 0.55%. This indicates that BRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRMSXDFLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.55%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

1.07%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

1.37%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.11%

1.93%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

2.73%

+2.52%

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRMSX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DFLEX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRMSX vs. DFLEX - Dividend Comparison

BRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than DFLEX's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRMSX
Bramshill Income Performance Fund
4.38%3.96%4.36%4.49%2.53%2.50%3.38%3.38%4.08%3.43%0.00%0.00%
DFLEX
DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund
5.53%5.68%6.05%5.95%4.72%3.86%3.96%4.46%4.46%3.82%3.75%4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRMSX and DFLEX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRMSX has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to DFLEX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRMSX dropped -17.06% vs DFLEX's -17.29%.

DFLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRMSX and DFLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer