BRKC vs. XRMI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. BRKC is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Over the past year, BRKC returned -1.49% vs 8.70% for XRMI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRKC charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

BRKC vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKC achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 1.60% return.

BRKC

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: -0.82%
• 6M: -0.54%
• 1Y: -1.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 8.70%
• 3Y*: 6.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRKC vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	-0.82%	0.76%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	1.60%	7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BRKC and XRMI is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

BRKC vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKC

BRKC Risk / Return Rank: 7
BRKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BRKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BRKC Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 49
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKC vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRKC	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	1.59	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	2.22	-2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.31	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	1.74	-1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	7.01	-7.42

BRKC vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKC Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKC and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRKC vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKC drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKC and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKC	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-15.31%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-5.02%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.82%	-0.58%	-2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-5.87%	+2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	1.24%	+2.49%

Volatility

BRKC vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.70%. This indicates that BRKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRKC	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	1.70%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	4.43%	+5.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	5.50%	+7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.46%	6.90%	+5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.46%	6.90%	+5.56%

BRKC vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRKC has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRKC vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

BRKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%, more than XRMI's 12.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF	20.90%	10.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.73%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRKC and XRMI in my portfolio?

BRKC and XRMI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRKC or XRMI?

BRKC has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to XRMI (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKC dropped -7.59% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

Which ETF is better, BRKC or XRMI?

On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 8.70% vs -1.49% for BRKC. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRKC or XRMI?

Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 8.70% return vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRKC or XRMI?

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRKC or XRMI?

BRKC has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 12.73% for XRMI.

What is the main difference between BRKC and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BRKC and 0.60% for XRMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.