BRKC vs. MRNY
BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BRKC returned 1.21% vs 53.06% for MRNY. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
BRKC vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKC achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 80.55% return.
BRKC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 1.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRNY
- 1D
- -6.67%
- 1M
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 42.34%
- YTD
- 80.55%
- 1Y
- 53.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKC vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.60% | 0.76% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 80.55% | -1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKC and MRNY is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKC vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
BRKC
MRNY
BRKC vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRKC | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.69 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 3.25 | -2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRKC vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKC drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKC and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKC | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -82.15% | +74.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -31.53% | +23.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -61.99% | +58.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -52.99% | +49.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 16.38% | -12.73% |
Volatility
BRKC vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) is 3.07%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 21.57%. This indicates that BRKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKC | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 21.57% | -18.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 38.66% | -28.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 53.19% | -40.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 51.61% | -39.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 51.61% | -39.19% |
BRKC vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BRKC and MRNY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
BRKC vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
BRKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.87%, less than MRNY's 96.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | 21.87% | 10.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 96.59% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKC and MRNY have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRNY has higher volatility (21.57%) compared to BRKC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKC dropped -7.59% vs MRNY's -82.15%.
On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 53.06% vs 1.21% for BRKC. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BRKC has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 53.06% return vs 1.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BRKC and MRNY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 96.59%, compared with 21.87% for BRKC.
MRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRKC and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer