BRK-B vs. AMDL
BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock, while AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past year, BRK-B returned 0.33% vs 703.78% for AMDL. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BRK-B vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRK-B achieves a -2.95% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 351.25% return.
BRK-B
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- -2.95%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 0.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
AMDL
- 1D
- 5.14%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 351.25%
- 6M
- 346.66%
- 1Y
- 703.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -2.95% | 10.89% | 11.06% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 351.25% | 103.00% | -69.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRK-B and AMDL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | -0.00 |
The correlation between BRK-B and AMDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRK-B vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
BRK-B
AMDL
BRK-B vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRK-B | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.50 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 12.66 | -12.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 24.60 | -24.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRK-B vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRK-B drawdown since its inception was -53.86%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRK-B and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRK-B | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.86% | -88.63% | +34.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -56.13% | +46.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -8.87% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.07% | -47.61% | +36.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 28.82% | -24.31% |
Volatility
BRK-B vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) is 3.80%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.56%. This indicates that BRK-B experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRK-B | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 46.56% | -42.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 101.72% | -91.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 133.92% | -119.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 118.33% | -101.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 118.33% | -98.94% |
Dividends
BRK-B vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRK-B nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BRK-B and AMDL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDL has higher volatility (46.56%) compared to BRK-B (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRK-B dropped -53.86% vs AMDL's -88.63%.
AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.31 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRK-B and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer