BRGOX vs. QQMNX
BRGOX (Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N) and QQMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares) are both Equity Market Neutral funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BRGOX returned 13.14% vs 3.39% for QQMNX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRGOX charges 1.63%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for QQMNX.
Performance
BRGOX vs. QQMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRGOX achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than QQMNX's -0.05% return.
BRGOX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 5.35%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQMNX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRGOX vs. QQMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRGOX Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N | 4.08% | 14.76% |
QQMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | -0.05% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRGOX and QQMNX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRGOX vs. QQMNX — Risk / Return Rank
BRGOX
QQMNX
BRGOX vs. QQMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N (BRGOX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (QQMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRGOX | QQMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 0.51 | +1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.05 | 0.80 | +2.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.11 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 0.77 | +2.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 1.86 | +6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRGOX | QQMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.51 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.86 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
BRGOX vs. QQMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRGOX drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, smaller than the maximum QQMNX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRGOX and QQMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRGOX | QQMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -17.50% | +13.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.37% | -4.37% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -2.10% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -4.85% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.82% | -0.13% |
Volatility
BRGOX vs. QQMNX - Volatility Comparison
Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N (BRGOX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (QQMNX) have volatilities of 2.14% and 2.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRGOX | QQMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 2.22% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.64% | 5.22% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.84% | 6.71% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.81% | 13.55% | -5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.81% | 13.55% | -5.74% |
BRGOX vs. QQMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRGOX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is lower than QQMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRGOX vs. QQMNX - Dividend Comparison
BRGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.92%, more than QQMNX's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRGOX Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N | 10.92% | 11.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | 1.74% | 1.74% | 1.86% | 5.94% | 11.53% | 20.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRGOX and QQMNX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQMNX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to BRGOX (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRGOX dropped -4.37% vs QQMNX's -17.50%.
BRGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRGOX and QQMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer