PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQMNX vs. BDMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (QQMNX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMNX achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than BDMAX's 11.82% return.


QQMNX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.70%
6M
5.36%
YTD
4.73%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.27%

BDMAX

1D
1.16%
1M
1.62%
6M
10.73%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
8.21%
ALL TIME*
6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
4.73%10.27%17.59%4.96%9.47%12.38%
BDMAX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund
11.82%18.08%21.12%14.27%1.57%-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMNX and BDMAX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.17

The correlation between QQMNX and BDMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQMNX vs. BDMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQMNX
QQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMAX
BDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (QQMNX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQMNXBDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.60

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

7.28

-5.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

19.24

-14.30

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQMNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the BDMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMNX and BDMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMNX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than BDMAX's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMNX and BDMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQMNXBDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-12.37%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.37%

-3.25%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.37%

-4.15%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.15%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-2.80%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.23%

+0.64%

Volatility

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (QQMNX) is 1.50%, while BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that QQMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQMNXBDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

2.58%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

5.36%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.79%

7.39%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

6.67%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.37%

5.90%

+7.47%

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMNX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than BDMAX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQMNX vs. BDMAX - Dividend Comparison

QQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than BDMAX's 11.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMAX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund
11.66%8.94%13.39%7.14%0.00%1.25%0.04%6.60%0.85%0.00%0.00%1.56%
QQMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares
1.66%1.74%1.86%5.94%11.53%20.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQMNX and BDMAX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDMAX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to QQMNX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMNX dropped -17.50% vs BDMAX's -12.37%.

BDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQMNX and BDMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer