BRGOX vs. BRUSX
BRGOX (Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N) and BRUSX (Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund) are both mutual funds - BRGOX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by Bridgeway, while BRUSX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Bridgeway. Over the past year, BRGOX returned 13.04% vs 30.61% for BRUSX. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. BRGOX charges 1.63%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for BRUSX.
Performance
BRGOX vs. BRUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRGOX achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than BRUSX's 10.04% return.
BRGOX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 13.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRUSX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
BRGOX vs. BRUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRGOX Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N | 4.27% | 14.76% |
BRUSX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund | 10.04% | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRGOX and BRUSX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRGOX vs. BRUSX — Risk / Return Rank
BRGOX
BRUSX
BRGOX vs. BRUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N (BRGOX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRGOX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 1.45 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.38 | 2.03 | +1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.24 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.29 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | 6.44 | +2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRGOX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.45 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 0.51 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
BRGOX vs. BRUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRGOX drawdown since its inception was -4.37%, smaller than the maximum BRUSX drawdown of -60.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRGOX and BRUSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRGOX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -60.38% | +56.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.37% | -12.87% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -0.48% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -13.55% | +12.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 4.58% | -2.91% |
Volatility
BRGOX vs. BRUSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N (BRGOX) is 2.20%, while Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that BRGOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRGOX | BRUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 4.71% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.65% | 13.57% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 21.47% | -14.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 23.23% | -15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 23.35% | -15.53% |
BRGOX vs. BRUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRGOX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than BRUSX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRGOX vs. BRUSX - Dividend Comparison
BRGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.90%, more than BRUSX's 9.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRGOX Bridgeway Global Opportunities Fund Class N | 10.90% | 11.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BRUSX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund | 9.59% | 10.56% | 2.46% | 4.97% | 18.41% | 7.70% | 1.53% | 1.14% | 13.87% | 1.99% | 1.12% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRGOX and BRUSX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRUSX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BRGOX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRGOX dropped -4.37% vs BRUSX's -60.38%.
BRGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRGOX and BRUSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer