QQMNX vs. MMNIX
QQMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares) and MMNIX (Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I) are both Equity Market Neutral funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQMNX returned 3.39% vs 9.63% for MMNIX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQMNX charges 1.86%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for MMNIX.
Performance
QQMNX vs. MMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQMNX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than MMNIX's 3.47% return.
QQMNX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMNIX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQMNX vs. MMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | -0.05% | 10.27% | 17.72% |
MMNIX Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I | 3.47% | 10.04% | 9.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQMNX and MMNIX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQMNX vs. MMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
QQMNX
MMNIX
QQMNX vs. MMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (QQMNX) and Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I (MMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQMNX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 2.82 | -1.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 20.83 | -20.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 89.27 | -87.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQMNX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 6.14 | -5.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 5.53 | -4.68 |
Drawdowns
QQMNX vs. MMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQMNX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than MMNIX's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMNX and MMNIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQMNX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -0.49% | -17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.37% | -0.46% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -0.09% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -0.06% | -4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 0.11% | +1.71% |
Volatility
QQMNX vs. MMNIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares (QQMNX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I (MMNIX) at 0.42%. This indicates that QQMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQMNX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 0.42% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.22% | 1.12% | +4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.71% | 1.56% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 1.74% | +11.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 1.74% | +11.81% |
QQMNX vs. MMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQMNX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than MMNIX's 1.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQMNX vs. MMNIX - Dividend Comparison
QQMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than MMNIX's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMNIX Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I | 4.75% | 5.03% | 4.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral Fund Institutional Shares | 1.74% | 1.74% | 1.86% | 5.94% | 11.53% | 20.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQMNX and MMNIX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQMNX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to MMNIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMNX dropped -17.50% vs MMNIX's -0.49%.
MMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.14 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQMNX and MMNIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer