PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRF vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRF vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -6.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BRF has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 6.50%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.97% annualized return.


BRF

1D
0.41%
1M
-11.58%
YTD
5.52%
6M
-1.66%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
-3.31%
10Y*
6.50%

BIZD

1D
2.25%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-6.93%
6M
-8.73%
1Y
-10.64%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
7.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRF vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.52%54.17%-35.02%37.21%-14.38%-20.40%-21.07%40.66%-12.07%54.63%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-6.93%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BRF and BIZD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.35

BRF vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRF
BIZD

Consumer Cyclical

14.2%

-

Real Estate

14.1%

-

Industrials

13.5%

-

Basic Materials

12.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.3%

-

Utilities

9.4%

-

Financial Services

8.9%
100.0%

Healthcare

6.0%

-

Energy

5.7%

-

Technology

4.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

BRF
14.2%
BIZD

-

Real Estate

BRF
14.1%
BIZD

-

Industrials

BRF
13.5%
BIZD

-

Basic Materials

BRF
12.9%
BIZD

-

Consumer Defensive

BRF
10.3%
BIZD

-

Utilities

BRF
9.4%
BIZD

-

Financial Services

BRF
8.9%
BIZD
100.0%

Healthcare

BRF
6.0%
BIZD

-

Energy

BRF
5.7%
BIZD

-

Technology

BRF
4.0%
BIZD

-

Communication Services

BRF

-

BIZD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRF vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRF vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRFBIZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.92

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

-0.48

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

-0.84

+4.47

BRF vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRF and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRFBIZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

-0.59

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.26

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.37

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.31

-0.25

Drawdowns

BRF vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRFBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.26%

-55.44%

-26.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-22.22%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

-22.56%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.49%

-22.91%

-27.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.43%

-55.44%

-4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.56%

-17.45%

-31.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.74%

-6.72%

-39.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

12.68%

-6.88%

Volatility

BRF vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 5.39%. This indicates that BRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRFBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

5.39%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.34%

14.95%

+9.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.38%

18.25%

+10.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.64%

17.43%

+14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.93%

21.74%

+12.19%

BRF vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRF vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than BIZD's 13.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.57%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.25%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRF and BIZD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRF has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to BIZD (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRF dropped -82.26% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.97% vs 6.50% for BRF. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BRF.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.57%, compared with 5.25% for BRF.

BRF is categorized as Latin America Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BRF and 0.42% for BIZD.

BRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRF and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer