BRCE vs. PSCX
BRCE (MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRCE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while PSCX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRCE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
BRCE vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRCE achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.83% return.
BRCE
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
BRCE vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 14.62% | 2.04% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.83% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRCE and PSCX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRCE vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
BRCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCX
BRCE vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRCE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRCE vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRCE drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCE and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRCE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -10.20% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -1.84% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility
BRCE vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRCE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 5.60% | +8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 7.12% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 6.95% | +7.40% |
BRCE vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRCE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRCE vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
BRCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 0.51% | 0.19% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRCE and PSCX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRCE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRCE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
BRCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
BRCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSCX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: MFS and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BRCE and 0.75% for PSCX.
Find the right allocation for BRCE and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer