PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRCE vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRCE vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRCE achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 19.93% return.


BRCE

1D
0.69%
1M
1.38%
6M
11.17%
YTD
14.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MTUM

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.35%
6M
17.31%
YTD
19.93%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
27.89%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
15.71%
ALL TIME*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.38K$9.51K$34.09K
$558.09M$637.73M$538.11M

BRCE vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BRCE and MTUM is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRCE vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRCE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRCE vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRCEMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

BRCE vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRCE vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRCE drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCE and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRCEMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-34.08%

+25.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-13.22%

+12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-6.22%

+4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

Volatility

BRCE vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRCEMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

25.53%

-11.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

21.89%

-7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

21.72%

-7.53%

BRCE vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRCE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRCE vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

BRCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than MTUM's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRCE
MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF
0.51%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.62%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRCE and MTUM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BRCE.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.51% for BRCE.

BRCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: MFS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BRCE and 0.15% for MTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRCE and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer