BRCE vs. FNDX
BRCE (MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRCE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. BRCE is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRCE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
BRCE vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRCE achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.
BRCE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 33.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
BRCE vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 12.37% | 2.68% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 15.35% | 3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRCE and FNDX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRCE vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
BRCE
FNDX
BRCE vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRCE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.80 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
BRCE vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRCE drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCE and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRCE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -37.72% | +28.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.55% | -3.55% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
BRCE vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRCE | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 10.22% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 15.18% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 17.50% | -3.39% |
BRCE vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRCE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BRCE vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
BRCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FNDX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRCE and FNDX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRCE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRCE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.34% for BRCE.
BRCE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: MFS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BRCE and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for BRCE and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer