BRCE vs. BDGS

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BRCE (MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRCE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

BRCE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRCE achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.86% return.

BRCE

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.19%
• 6M: 11.86%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: 5.42%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 1Y: 11.64%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRCE vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF	14.67%	2.04%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.86%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BRCE and BDGS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

BRCE vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRCE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 76
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRCE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF (BRCE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRCE	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.84	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.76	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.82	—

Drawdowns

BRCE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRCE drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRCE and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRCE	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-9.12%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.61%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-0.67%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BRCE	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.29%	6.36%	+7.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.29%	8.18%	+6.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.29%	8.18%	+6.11%

BRCE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRCE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRCE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

BRCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
BRCE MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF	0.51%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRCE and BDGS in my portfolio?

BRCE and BDGS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BRCE or BDGS?

On fees, BRCE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRCE or BDGS?

BRCE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRCE or BDGS?

BRCE and BDGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.51%.

What is the main difference between BRCE and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: MFS and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BRCE and 0.87% for BDGS.