BRAZ vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BRAZ (Global X Brazil Active ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRAZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the Solactive Brazil Mid Cap Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BRAZ returned 23.68% vs 21.61% for QYLD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRAZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Brazil Active ETF (BRAZ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRAZ achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.65% return.

BRAZ

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -6.41%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 6.55%
• 1Y: 23.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 7.29%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BRAZ Global X Brazil Active ETF	5.38%	45.42%	-29.74%	17.80%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.65%	9.28%	19.35%	4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BRAZ and QYLD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023	0.41

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRAZ	QYLD
Financial Services	34.4%	0.2%
Energy	18.3%	0.5%
Basic Materials	14.0%	1.0%
Industrials	11.6%	2.6%
Utilities	10.2%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.8%	11.4%
Real Estate	2.9%	0.1%
Healthcare	2.5%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	6.4%
Technology	1.0%	58.7%
Communication Services	-	14.3%

Return for Risk

BRAZ vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRAZ

BRAZ Risk / Return Rank: 28
BRAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BRAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BRAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BRAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BRAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 85
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Brazil Active ETF (BRAZ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BRAZ	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	2.24	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	3.15	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.50	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	4.37	-3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	24.01	-20.45

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRAZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRAZ and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRAZ drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRAZ and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRAZ	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.02%	-24.75%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.65%	-4.97%	-14.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.88%	-2.32%	-16.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.36%	-3.82%	-7.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.67%	0.90%	+5.77%

Volatility

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Brazil Active ETF (BRAZ) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.79%. This indicates that BRAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRAZ	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	4.79%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.11%	8.45%	+10.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.40%	9.69%	+14.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.52%	14.84%	+8.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.52%	15.55%	+7.97%

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRAZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRAZ vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

BRAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than QYLD's 11.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRAZ Global X Brazil Active ETF	3.24%	3.41%	4.16%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.71%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRAZ and QYLD in my portfolio?

BRAZ and QYLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRAZ or QYLD?

BRAZ has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to QYLD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRAZ dropped -31.02% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, BRAZ or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, BRAZ leads with 23.68% vs 21.61% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRAZ or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, BRAZ has performed better with a 23.68% return vs 21.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRAZ or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BRAZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRAZ or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.71%, compared with 3.24% for BRAZ.

What is the main difference between BRAZ and QYLD?

BRAZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. BRAZ tracks Solactive Brazil Mid Cap Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BRAZ and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.