PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPTRX vs. BIAWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPTRX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly higher than BIAWX's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BPTRX has outperformed BIAWX with an annualized return of 24.68%, while BIAWX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.20% annualized return.


BPTRX

1D
0.41%
1M
8.22%
YTD
3.60%
6M
2.76%
1Y
40.21%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
24.68%

BIAWX

1D
1.20%
1M
1.72%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
3.60%24.54%32.75%43.09%-42.53%31.35%148.81%44.99%-2.01%31.54%
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
1.83%3.18%20.20%38.88%-31.02%29.83%38.88%35.93%4.36%27.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BPTRX and BIAWX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.75

The correlation between BPTRX and BIAWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPTRX vs. BIAWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPTRX
BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAWX
BIAWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BIAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPTRXBIAWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.05

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

0.16

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

0.42

+8.63

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the BIAWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPTRX and BIAWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPTRX drawdown since its inception was -64.11%, which is greater than BIAWX's maximum drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPTRX and BIAWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPTRXBIAWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.11%

-36.94%

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-19.97%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.34%

-25.06%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.87%

-36.94%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-36.94%

-14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-4.98%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.77%

-5.74%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

7.70%

-3.33%

Volatility

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) at 6.47%. This indicates that BPTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPTRXBIAWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

6.47%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

13.91%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.64%

17.11%

+10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.72%

22.69%

+11.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

21.53%

+11.22%

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPTRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAWX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPTRX vs. BIAWX - Dividend Comparison

BPTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than BIAWX's 24.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
24.08%24.52%5.34%0.00%0.00%1.85%0.00%1.50%3.75%1.71%0.72%4.76%
BPTRX
Baron Partners Fund
3.24%3.36%0.76%0.00%3.19%7.72%3.67%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPTRX and BIAWX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPTRX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to BIAWX (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPTRX dropped -64.11% vs BIAWX's -36.94%.

BPTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPTRX and BIAWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer