PortfoliosLab logo
BIAWX vs. ACVF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BIAWX and ACVF is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

BIAWX vs. ACVF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
46.96%
84.39%
BIAWX
ACVF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BIAWX:

-0.01

ACVF:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

BIAWX:

0.13

ACVF:

1.02

Omega Ratio

BIAWX:

1.02

ACVF:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

BIAWX:

-0.03

ACVF:

0.71

Martin Ratio

BIAWX:

-0.08

ACVF:

2.80

Ulcer Index

BIAWX:

9.01%

ACVF:

4.27%

Daily Std Dev

BIAWX:

24.79%

ACVF:

18.60%

Max Drawdown

BIAWX:

-38.09%

ACVF:

-24.39%

Current Drawdown

BIAWX:

-14.03%

ACVF:

-5.08%

Returns By Period


BIAWX

YTD

-5.49%

1M

18.53%

6M

-12.01%

1Y

-0.20%

5Y*

12.14%

10Y*

12.62%

ACVF

YTD

0.00%

1M

14.10%

6M

-4.44%

1Y

11.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIAWX vs. ACVF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ACVF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIAWX vs. ACVF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAWX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIAWX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIAWX is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ACVF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACVF is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACVF is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACVF is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACVF is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACVF is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACVF is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BIAWX vs. ACVF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BIAWX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the ACVF Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAWX and ACVF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.01
0.64
BIAWX
ACVF

Dividends

BIAWX vs. ACVF - Dividend Comparison

BIAWX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


TTM20242023202220212020
BIAWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
0.61%0.59%0.83%0.93%0.61%0.23%

Drawdowns

BIAWX vs. ACVF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than ACVF's maximum drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and ACVF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.03%
-5.08%
BIAWX
ACVF

Volatility

BIAWX vs. ACVF - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) has a higher volatility of 13.25% compared to American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) at 10.36%. This indicates that BIAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACVF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.25%
10.36%
BIAWX
ACVF