BIAWX vs. SWPPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BIAWX (Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund) and SWPPX (Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - BIAWX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory, while SWPPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, BIAWX returned 14.91%/yr vs 14.98%/yr for SWPPX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BIAWX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SWPPX.

Performance

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAWX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 9.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIAWX having a 14.91% annualized return and SWPPX not far ahead at 14.98%.

BIAWX

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -0.17%
• 6M: 9.58%
• YTD: 4.58%
• 1Y: 2.98%
• 3Y*: 11.51%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 14.91%
• ALL TIME*: 15.13%

SWPPX

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 7.81%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 1Y: 20.64%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: 14.98%
• ALL TIME*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund	4.58%	3.18%	20.20%	38.88%	-31.02%	29.83%	38.88%	35.93%	4.36%	27.89%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	9.35%	17.87%	24.96%	26.26%	-18.14%	28.67%	18.38%	31.46%	-4.47%	21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAWX and SWPPX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012	0.89

The correlation between BIAWX and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BIAWX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BIAWX

BIAWX Risk / Return Rank: 5
BIAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BIAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BIAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BIAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BIAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SWPPX

SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 63
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIAWX	SWPPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	1.42	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	1.99	-1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.26	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	2.07	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.02	8.85	-8.87

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAWX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAWX and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and SWPPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIAWX	SWPPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.94%	-55.06%	+18.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.97%	-8.89%	-11.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.06%	-18.74%	-6.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.94%	-24.51%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.94%	-33.80%	-3.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-2.09%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-9.90%	+4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.75%	2.07%	+5.68%

Volatility

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 3.49%. This indicates that BIAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIAWX	SWPPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	3.49%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	10.13%	+4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.52%	12.89%	+4.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.77%	17.05%	+5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	18.23%	+3.30%

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIAWX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

BIAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.45%, more than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund	23.45%	24.52%	5.34%	0.00%	0.00%	1.85%	0.00%	1.50%	3.75%	1.71%	0.72%	4.76%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	1.01%	1.11%	1.23%	1.43%	1.67%	1.27%	1.81%	1.95%	2.67%	1.79%	2.55%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIAWX and SWPPX in my portfolio?

BIAWX and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIAWX or SWPPX?

BIAWX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to SWPPX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAWX dropped -36.94% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.