BIAWX vs. VV

In the year-to-date period, BIAWX achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly lower than VV's -3.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIAWX having a 12.48% annualized return and VV not far behind at 12.20%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BIAWX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the VV Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAWX and VV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BIAWX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.

The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and VV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) has a higher volatility of 13.46% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 11.64%. This indicates that BIAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.