BPH vs. QMOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian, while QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.

Performance

BPH vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BPH

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMOM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 6M: 26.71%
• 1Y: 31.51%
• 3Y*: 23.22%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 13.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPH vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	2.83%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BPH and QMOM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	0.09

BPH vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BPH	QMOM
Energy	100.0%	5.5%
Basic Materials	-	9.0%
Communication Services	-	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.6%
Financial Services	-	1.9%
Healthcare	-	8.9%
Industrials	-	37.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	23.9%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

BPH vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 42
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPH vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BPH	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	9.48	0.52	+8.96

Drawdowns

BPH vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and QMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPH	QMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-39.13%	+36.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-12.92%	+11.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BPH	QMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.75%	23.30%	+2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.75%	24.19%	+1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.75%	26.49%	-0.74%

BPH vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPH vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.44%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPH and QMOM in my portfolio?

BPH and QMOM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BPH or QMOM?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPH or QMOM?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPH or QMOM?

QMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

What is the main difference between BPH and QMOM?

BPH is categorized as Oil & Gas, while QMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.28% for QMOM.