PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPAY vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPAY vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


BPAY

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.05%
YTD
-9.13%
6M
-11.58%
1Y
-17.22%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAY vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and WNTR is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.51

The correlation between BPAY and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPAY vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPAYWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.33

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

2.73

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

6.99

-7.95

BPAY vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPAYWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-42.65%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-42.65%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.23%

-4.02%

-19.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-20.87%

+10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.01%

16.66%

+1.35%

Volatility

BPAY vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) is 9.69%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that BPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPAYWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

18.14%

-8.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.73%

46.41%

-26.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.85%

53.16%

-27.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.47%

53.31%

-28.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.47%

53.31%

-28.84%

BPAY vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPAY vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.46%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
94.34%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPAY and WNTR have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to BPAY (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs -17.22% for BPAY. On fees, BPAY is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BPAY has been the lower-risk option at 9.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs -17.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BPAY is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 7.46% for BPAY.

BPAY is categorized as Financials Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPAY and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer